Select Page

Reflection is a key element of becoming a lifelong learner. Reflection involves critically assessing your own actions and experiences to determine what you can learn from the past.
Upon successful completion of this discussion, you will be able to:

Examine tools for suitability for research.

Instructions

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Review the instructions for using Video Note in the Getting Started playlist. Then use the Insert Stuff icon in your discussion post to access the Video Note tool.
Prepare a three-minute video note posting that answers the following questions:

How could the tools and techniques you learned this week enable you to make better decisions?
How could you apply them to your doctoral project?

Submit your video post by the fourth day of the workshop.
Respond in writing to two of your classmates.
Each written response should be 100 – 200 words in length and demonstrate a critical analysis of your classmate’s post.
The responses are due by the end of the workshop.

5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 1/3

Application to ADP Discussion (25 points)
Course: 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B)

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

Question No.

1

/ 8

Question No.

2

/ 8

8 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical thinking

discussing how

the tools and

techniques

learned could

enable better

decisions.

7 points

(6-7 points)

Demonstrated

competent

critical thinking

in discussing

how the tools

and

techniques

learned could

enable better

decisions.

5 points

(4-5 points)

Demonstrated

limited critical

thinking in

discussing how

the tools and

techniques

learned could

enable better

decisions.

3 points

(0-3 points)

Demonstrated

little to no

critical thinking

in discussing

how the tools

and

techniques

learned could

enable better

decisions.

8 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical thinking

discussing how

to apply the

tools and

techniques

learned to your

ADP.

7 points

(6-7 points)

Demonstrated

competent

critical thinking

in discussing

how to apply

the tools and

techniques

learned to your

ADP.

5 points

(4-5 points)

Demonstrated

limited critical

thinking in

discussing how

to apply the

tools and

techniques

learned to your

ADP.

3 points

(0-3 points)

Demonstrated

little to no

critical thinking

in discussing

how to apply

the tools and

techniques

learned to your

ADP.

5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 2/3

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

Response to

Classmates

/ 66 points

Demonstrated

clear, insightful

critical analysis

of classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of the

arguments, the

correctness of

the facts, the

reasonableness

of

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of

references.

5 points

Demonstrated

competent

critical analysis

of classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of the

arguments, the

correctness of

the facts, the

reasonableness

of

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of

references.

3 points

Demonstrated

limited critical

analysis of

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of the

arguments, the

correctness of

the facts, the

reasonableness

of

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of

references.

1 point

Demonstrated

little to no

critical analysis

of your

classmates’

postings in

determining

the logic of the

arguments, the

correctness of

the facts, the

reasonableness

of

interpretations

and

consistency

with the

substance and

intent of

references.

5/21/22, 8:22 PM Preview Rubric: Application to ADP Discussion (25 points) – 3SU2022 Data Analytics & Research (BADM-707-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan Univ…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=165060&rubricId=518395&originTool=quicklinks 3/3

Total / 25

Overall Score

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

Grammar,

Spelling,

Length, and

Citation

/ 33 points

Sentence

structure is

complete with

correct

spelling,

punctuation,

capitalization,

varied diction,

and word

choices.

Assignment

length is

correct with

sources

correctly cited.

2 points

Sentence

structure has

minor errors

(fragments,

run-ons) with

correct

spelling,

punctuation,

capitalization,

and limited

diction and

word choices.

Assignment

length is

correct with

sources

correctly cited.

1 point

Sentence

structure has

several errors

in sentence

fluency with

multiple

fragments/run-

ons; poor

spelling,

punctuation,

and/or word

choice.

Assignment

length is

inappropriate

with several

format and

citation errors.

0 points

Sentence

structure has

serious and

persistent

errors in

sentence

fluency,

sentence

structure,

spelling,

punctuation,

and/or word

choice.

Assignment

length is

inappropriate

with several

format and

citation errors

or sources not

cited.

Excellent
23 points minimum

Competent
21 points minimum

Needs Improvement
18 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing
0 points minimum