Select Page

IN O’CONNOR V. CONSOLIDATED COIN CATERERS CORP., THE COURT OF APPEAL HELD THAT:​ A. ​NONE OF THE ABOVE. B. ​THE ADEA DID NOT REQUIRE THE EMPLOYER TO DEMONSTRATE ANY INTENTION TO DISCRIMINATE. C. – BUSINESS & FINANCE

In o’connor v. consolidated coin caterers corp., the court of appeal held that:​ a. ​none of the above. b. ​the adea did not require the employer to demonstrate any intention to discriminate. c. ​whether the replacement was over or under 40 years of age was...